咨询电话:400-6300-966

招考
资讯

考试动态 大纲 招简 考研常识 指南 择校择专业 报录比 在职考研 >>

备考
资料

政治 英语 数学 联考 专业课 专硕 历年真题 考研资料 >>

考研
课程

全年集训营 乐学考研 推免 启学OL/OAO 魔鬼集训 >>

考研
学科

经济 会计 法学 医学 金融 心理 管理 艺术 教育 翻译 计算机

招生资讯

考试动态 考研大纲 招生简章 报录比 择校择专业 招生目录 考研常识 考研报考 考研指南 院校排名 准考证打印 考试书目 成绩查询 考研复试 调剂信息 保研推免 考研分数线 录取通知 考研时间 在职考研 考研调剂 大专考研 考研问答

备考资料

考研英语: 英语词汇 阅理解读 新题型    完型填空 大作文 语法 翻译 考研数学: 高等数学 线性代数 概率统计 模拟试题 考研政治:时政热点 马哲原理 近代史 思修法基 毛中特 真题 试题 考研联考:初等数学 逻辑推理 中文写作 经济类数学

考研课程

魔鬼集训营 全年集训营 在校生考研 经济类联考 在职考研 经济学考研 心理学考研 医学考研 应用心理硕士 教育硕士考研 解题训练营 考研推免生 乐学早起鸟 管理类联考 会计学考研 艺术考研 教育学考研 法硕考研 金融硕士考研 管理学考研

您所在的位置: 中公考研 > 翻译硕士 > 备考指导 > 正文

上海外国语大学2012年翻译硕士MTI考研与答案

发布时间:2015-11-04 13:36:35 | 来源:中公考研  

2016考研冲刺交流群:1724916892016考研冲刺交流

群4

 上海外国语大学2012年翻译硕士MTIk考研

I. Phrase Translation

1. Austerity measures: 财政紧缩措施

2. UNESCO: 联合国教科文组织( United Nations Educational,Scientific and Cultural Organization )

3. The US Senate: (美国)参议院

4. APEC: 亚太经济合作组织亚太经合组织(Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation)

5. Washington Post: (美国)《华盛顿邮报》

6. NATO: 北大西洋公约组织(North Atlantic Treaty Organization)

7. Arab Spring: 阿拉伯之春

8. Gary Locke: 骆家辉 (原美国驻华大使)

9. Reuters:(英国)路透社

10. Wall Street Journal:(美国)《华尔街日报》

II. 中文词汇翻译成英文

十二五规划:Twelfth Five-Year Plan

十七届六中全会:the Sixth Plenary Session of the seventeenthCentral Committee

全国人大:NPC ( National People’s Congress )

新华社:the Xinhua News Agency

软实力: Soft Power

中美战略经济对话:China-US Strategic and EconomicDialogue

上海合作组织:SCO ( Shanghai Cooperation Organization )

珠江三角州:Pearl River Delta

西气东输:project of natural gas transmission from West to East China; West–East Gas Pipeline

北京共识: Beijing Consensus

II. Passage translation

Section A English to Chinese

Reforming education

-The great schools revolution

Education remains the trickiest part of attempts to reform the public sector. But as ever more countries embark on it, some vital lessons are beginning to be learned

Sep 17th 2011 | DRESDEN, NEW YORK AND WROCLAW| from the print edition

FROM Toronto to Wroclaw, London to Rome, pupils and teachers have been returning to the classroom after their summer break. But this September schools themselves are caught up in a global battle of ideas. In many countries education is at the forefront of political debate, and reformers desperate to improve their national performance are drawing examples of good practice from all over the world.

Why now? One answer is the sheer amount of data available on performance, not just within countries but between them. In 2000 the Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA) at the OECD, a rich-country club, began tracking academic attainment by the age of 15 in 32 countries. Many were shocked by where they came in the rankings. (PISA’s latest figures appear in table 1.) Other outfits, too, have been measuring how good or bad schools are. McKinsey, a consultancy, has monitored which education systems have improved most in recent years.

Technology has also made a difference. After a number of false starts, many people now believe that the internet can make a real difference to educating children. Hence the success of institutions like America’s Kahn Academy (see article). Experimentation is also infectious; the more governments try things, the more others examine, and copy, the results.

Above all, though, there has been a change in the quality of the debate. In particular, what might be called “the three great excuses” for bad schools have receded in importance. Teachers’ unions have long maintained that failures in Western education could be blamed on skimpy government spending, social class and cultures that did not value education. All these make a difference, but they do not determine outcomes by themselves.

The idea that good schooling is about spending money is the one that has been beaten back hardest. Many of the 20 leading economic performers in the OECD doubled or tripled their education spending in real terms between 1970 and 1994, yet outcomes in many countries stagnated—or went backwards. Educational performance varies widely even among countries that spend similar amounts per pupil. Such spending is highest in the United States—yet America lags behind other developed countries on overall outcomes in secondary education. Andreas Schleicher, head of analysis at PISA, thinks that only about 10% of the variation in pupil performance has anything to do with money.

Many still insist, though, that social class makes a difference. Martin Johnson, an education trade unionist, points to Britain’s “inequality between classes, which is among the largest in the wealthiest nations” as the main reason why its pupils underperform. A review of reforms over the past decade by researchers at Oxford University supports him. “Despite rising attainment levels,” it concludes, “there has been little narrowing of longstanding and sizeable attainment gaps. Those from disadvantaged backgrounds remain at higher risks of poor outcomes.” American studies confirm the point; Dan Goldhaber of the University of Washington claims that “non-school factors”, such as family income, account for as much as 60% of a child’s performance in school.

Yet the link is much more variable than education egalitarians suggest. Australia, for instance, has wide discrepancies of income, but came a creditable ninth in the most recent PISA study. China, rapidly developing into one of the world’s least equal societies, finished first.

Culture is certainly a factor. Many Asian parents pay much more attention to their children’s test results than Western ones do, and push their schools to succeed. Singapore, Hong Kong and South Korea sit comfortably at the top of McKinsey’s rankings (see table 2). But not only do some Western countries do fairly well; there are also huge differences within them. Even if you put to one side the unusual Asians, as this briefing will now do, many Western systems could jump forward merely by bringing their worst schools up to the standard of their best.

So what are the secrets of success? Though there is no one template, four important themes emerge: decentralisation (handing power back to schools); a focus on underachieving pupils; a choice of different sorts of schools; and high standards for teachers. These themes can all be traced in three places that did well in McKinsey’s league: Ontario, Poland and Saxony.

Section B Chinese to English

国务院新闻办发表《中国特色社会主义法律体系》白皮书,这是2011年10月27号发布的。以下是其中的一些内容。

社会实践是法律的基础,法律是实践经验的总结、提炼。社会实践永无止境,法律体系也要与时俱进。建设中国特色社会主义是一项长期的历史任务,完善中国特色社会主义法律体系同样是一项长期而又艰巨的任务,必须随着中国特色社会主义实践的发展不断向前推进。

法律的生命力在于实施。中国特色社会主义法律体系的形成,总体上解决了有法可依的问题,对有法必依、执法必严、违法必究提出了更为突出、更加紧迫的要求。中国将积极采取有效措施,切实保障宪法和法律的有效实施,加快推进依法治国、建设社会主义法治国家的进程。 

2016考研倒计时的钟声已经敲响,考生只有做好充分准备才能赢得胜利,在此阶段考生们要保持良好的心态,全身心的投入到考研这场战役中去。中公考研特为广大学子推出2016考研冲刺集训专业课一对一精品网课vip1对1、系列备考专题,针对每一个科目要点进行深入的指导分析,欢迎各位考生了解咨询。同时,中公考研一直为大家推出考研直播课堂,足不出户就可以边听课边学习,为大家的考研梦想助力!

推荐阅读>>>>上海外国语大学2011年翻译硕士MTI考研与答案 

免责声明:本站所提供的内容均来源于网友提供或网络搜集,由本站编辑整理,仅供个人研究、交流学习使用,不涉及商业盈利目的。如涉及版权问题,请联系本站管理员予以更改或删除。

【责任编辑:王天天】

中公考研课堂

  • 考研公共课
  • 考研专业课
课程系列 班次名称 价格 免费试听
考研政治网络课堂 2023年考研网校全程进阶班-政治 ¥980.00 免费试听
考研英语网络课堂 2023年考研网校全程进阶班-英语一 ¥980.00 免费试听
2023年考研网校全程进阶班-英语二 ¥980.00 免费试听
考研数学网络课堂 2023年考研网校联报进阶VIP班-政英二数 ¥2240.00 免费试听
2023年考研网校全程进阶班-数学 ¥980.00 免费试听
2023年考研网校联报进阶VIP班-政数 ¥1560.00 免费试听
考研管综网络课堂 2023年考研网校全程进阶班-管综 ¥1980.00 免费试听
联报精讲VIP班 23考研在职人起跑公共课直播VIP班-联报 ¥4880.00 免费试听
23考研在职人联报专属VIP班-政英二经综 ¥4140.00 免费试听
2023考研在职人联报专属VIP班-政英二数 ¥4140.00 免费试听
  2023考研全年集训营

考研是一场选拔性考试,没有捷径。2023考研来袭备考需尽早启动,从"择校"到"复试",中公考研带你科学备考>> GO>

  2023考研乐学辅导班

23考研大数据解密变难"成必然趋势?与其焦虑不如提早准备营造优势,23乐学让你满载而归。地毯式扫清学习漏洞,漏洞式补强薄弱环节GO>

面授课程

|

网校课程

考研题库

  • 英语真题
  • 政治真题
  • 数学真题
  • 专业课真题

英语一: 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017 2016

英语二: 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017 2016

政 治: 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017 2016

单选题: 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017 2016

多选题: 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017 2016

分析题: 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017 2016

数学一: 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017 2016

数学二: 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017 2016

数学三: 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017 2016

心理学: 2021 2019 2018 2017 2016 2014

教育学: 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017 2016

管理类: 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017 2016

经济类: 2020 2019 2018 2017 2016 2015

西 医: 2021 2020 2016 2013 2012 2011

报考信息

备考指导

 

 

中公考研名师指导: 择校择专业 跨专业报考 1V1专业解答